Comparative pharmacokinetics of tedizolid in rat plasma and cerebrospinal fluid.

To investigate the possibility of tedizolid phosphate's application in the treatment of intracranial infection, a preclinical comparative pharmacokinetic study was designed. Based on the assumption that the classic efflux transporters P-glycoprotein (P-gp) and breast cancer resistance protein (BCRP) may participate in the transportation of TDZ, two groups of rats were intravenously administered 6 mg/kg tedizolid phosphate alone or 6 mg/kg tedizolid phosphate combined with 1 mg/kg elacridar which was an inhibitor of P-gp and BCRP. Plasma and cerebrospinal fluid samples were collected according to a pharmacokinetic schedule. All the plasma and cerebrospinal fluid samples were assessed with a validated LC-MS/MS method. The penetration ratio of tedizolid from the blood to cerebrospinal fluid was calculated, and a comparison of the penetration ratios between the two groups was made. The mean Cmax of tedizolid in the CSF in the tedizolid phosphate group and the tedizolid phosphate combined with elacridar group was 154 ng/mL and 300 ng/mL, respectively, and the mean penetration ratio of tedizolid in the tedizolid phosphate group and the tedizolid phosphate combined with elacridar group was 2.16% and 3.53%, respectively. The relatively high Cmax in the CSF proved the possibility of tedizolid phosphate's application in the treatment of intracranial infection, and the higher penetration ratios, Cmax, csf and AUCcsf of the rats in co-administered elacridar group than those in the single-administration group indicated that the transporters P-gp and BCRP might be involved in the transportation of tedizolid.

Plasma and cerebrospinal fluid concentrations of linezolid in neurosurgical critically ill patients with proven or suspected central nervous system infections.

Linezolid is a valuable treatment option for central nervous system (CNS) infections caused by multidrug-resistant Gram-positive micro-organisms. Data regarding its penetration into the CNS have shown wide variability. The aim of this study was to describe the population pharmacokinetics of linezolid in plasma and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) in critically ill patients with external CSF drainage and proven or suspected CNS infections. This was an observational pharmacokinetic (PK) study in 11 critically ill patients with proven or suspected CNS infection receiving linezolid. Serial blood and CSF samples were taken and were subject to population PK analysis. The median (interquartile range) of AUC(0-12h) was 47.6 (17.9-58.6) mgh/L in plasma and 21.1 (18.8-30.4) mgh/L in CSF, with a median CSF/plasma ratio of 0.77. At pre-dose at steady state, a strong positive correlation was observed between linezolid concentrations in CSF and plasma (Spearman's rho=0.758; P=0.011). For a minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) of 2 mg/L, the median AUC(0-24h)/MIC values in plasma and CSF were <80 in all patients. A three-compartment linear model was found to be most appropriate. The mean value for linezolid clearance was 16.6L/h and mean volume of distribution was 101.3 L. No covariate relationships could be supported on any of the parameters. Linezolid demonstrated good penetration into the CNS but high interindividual PK variability. Administration of higher than standard doses of linezolid and therapeutic drug monitoring should therefore be considered as options to optimise linezolid dosing in critically ill patients with CNS infections.

Quantitative determination of zolmitriptan in rat blood and cerebrospinal fluid by reversed phase HPLC-ESI-MS/MS analysis: application to in vivo preclinical pharmacokinetic study.

A fast HPLC-ESI-MS/MS method has been developed and validated for the quantification of the potent and selective antimigraine zolmitriptan in rat blood and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF). The assay has been then applied for in vivo preclinical studies. The analytical determination has been used to obtain pharmacokinetics of zolmitriptan in the two biological matrices after its intravenous or nasal administration. Liquid-liquid extraction of zolmitriptan was performed from 100 µL rat blood samples in the presence of N(6)-cyclopentyladenosine (internal standard) with the employment of ethyl acetate. Calibration standards were prepared by using blood matrix and following the same liquid-liquid extraction procedure. CSF samples were analyzed without any pre-treatment steps and by using an external calibration method in pure water matrix. Chromatographic separation was performed under reversed phase and a gradient elution condition on a C18 packed column (100 × 2.0 mm, 2.5 µm particles diameter). The mobile phase was a mixture between acetonitrile, water and formic acid (0.1% v/v). The applied HPLC-MS/MS method allowed low limits of detection, as calculated from calibration curves, of 6.6 and 24.4 ng/mL for water matrix and rat blood extracts, respectively. Linearity of the calibration curves was established up to 5 µM (1.44 µg/mL), as well as good assay accuracy. The intravenous infusion of 20 µg zolmitriptan to male Sprague-Dawley rats produced blood concentrations ranging from 9.4±0.7 to 1.24±0.07 µg/mL within 10 h, with a terminal half-life of 3.4±0.2h. The nasal administration of a water suspension of 20 µg zolmitriptan produced blood concentrations ranging from 2.92±0.21 to 0.85±0.07 µg/mL within 6h. One hour after zolmitriptan intravenous infusion or nasal administration, its CSF concentrations were 0.0539±0.0016 and 0.0453±0.0012 µg/mL, respectively. This study determined the suitability of the herein proposed method to investigate the pharmacokinetics of zolmitriptan after its administration by means of novel formulations and, hence, to evaluate the efficacy of innovative nose-to-brain drug delivery in preclinical studies.

Evaluation of submicron emulsion as vehicles for rapid-onset intranasal delivery and improvement in brain targeting of zolmitriptan.

This study was to evaluate submicron emulsion as a drug carrier for intranasal delivery of zolmitriptan (ZT). Since the drug distribution in submicron emulsion might influence the nasal absorption, two different formulations separately incorporating the drug in oily phase (ZTSE-1) and aqueous phase (ZTSE-2) were assessed. To find the better formulation for rapid-onset intranasal delivery and improvement in brain targeting of ZT, the in vivo nasal absorption of these two formulations was evaluated. The blood and cerebrospinalfluid (CSF) pharmacokinetics of ZTSE-1, ZTSE-2 and ZT solution (ZTS) were evaluated after intranasal administered to anesthetized Wistar rats. The results demonstrated that ZT from ZTSE-1 and ZTSE-2 had better brain targeting efficiency than the ZTS. In plasma and CSF, the ZTSE-2 reached peak concentration much faster than ZTSE-1 and ZTS. The ZTSE-2 also presented significantly higher initial ZT levels in CSF compared with the ZTSE-1 and ZTS. The results indicated that incorporation of ZT in the aqueous phase of submicron emulsion was effective for rapid intranasal delivery of drug to blood and brain, which would offer patients the benefits of rapid relief from migraine.

Linezolid penetration into cerebrospinal fluid and brain tissue.

The aim of the study was to evaluate the penetration of linezolid into cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) and brain tissue after a single i.v. dose of 600 mg. The penetration of linezolid into cerebrospinal fluid and brain tissue was studied in 18 patients undergoing a neurosurgical procedure. Linezolid 600 mg i.v. was given with the induction of anesthesia. Mean concentrations of linezolid 2h after the final dose, in serum, cerbrospinal fluid and brain tissue were assayed by HPLC. CSF/serum and brain/serum ratios were 69.57% and 44.66% respectively. Concentrations of linezolid were above the MIC(90s )for staphylococci and streptococci. The concentrations obtained indicate good penetration of linezolid into CSF and brain tissue and support its use in the management of multidrug-resistant Gram-positive CNS infections.

[Measuring linezolid in biological fluids using high-efficiency liquid chromatography]. / Determinación de linezolid en fluidos biológicos mediante cromatografía líquida de alta eficacia.

OBJECTIVE: Evaluation of an analytic method for determining linezolid concentrations in biological fluids including plasma, vitreous humour and cerebrospinal fluid using high-efficiency liquid chromatography and subsequent ultraviolet detection. METHOD: The method was validated by studying the following parameters: accuracy, precision, sensitivity, linearity and recovery. The drug was extracted from the biological matrix by means of a protein precipitation with perchloric acid. Chromatographic separation was performed by eluting linezolid with a mobile phase consisting of 80% K2HPO4 buffer solution (15 mM; pH=5) and 20% acetonitrile, and a stationary phase, NOVAPAK C18 150x3.9 mm with precolumn. The wavelength reading was 254 nm and the working flow rate was 1 ml/min. RESULTS: We obtained values with accuracies between 94.4 and 106.1%, and precisions between 0.88-6% and 3.7-5.6% for intra-and inter-day variability, respectively. Recovery obtained after analysing the plasma samples was at 93%. The method showed itself to be linear for the concentration levels under study. DISCUSSION: The method's behaviour can be described as linear, precise and accurate. Furthermore, the method is fast, sensitive, and inexpensive. It is useful for determining linezolid concentrations in multiple biological matrices. It can also be used as a basis for further clinical pharmacokinetic studies.

Determinación de linezolid en fluidos biológicos mediante cromatografía líquida de alta eficacia / No disponible

Objetivo Validación de un método analítico para la determinación de concentraciones de linezolid (LNZ) en fluidos biológicos: plasma, humor vítreo y líquido cefalorraquídeo mediante cromatografía líquida de alta eficacia y posterior detección ultravioleta. Método El método se validó mediante el estudio de los siguientes parámetros: exactitud, precisión, sensibilidad, linealidad y recuperación. El fármaco se extrajo de la matriz biológica mediante una precipitación proteica con ácido perclórico. La separación cromatográfica se realizó mediante la elución de LNZ con una fase móvil compuesta por el 80% de un tampón de fosfato dipotásico-monohidrogenado (K2HPO4) (15mM; pH=5) con el 20% de acetonitrilo y una fase estacionaria NOVAPAK® C18 150×3,9mm con precolumna. La longitud de onda de lectura fue de 254nm y el flujo de trabajo fue de 1ml/min. Resultados Se obtuvieron valores de exactitud entre el 94,4–106,1% y de precisión entre el 0,88–6% y el 3,7–5,6% para la variabilidad intradía e interdía, respectivamente. La recuperación obtenida tras el análisis de las muestras de plasma fue del 93%. El método mostró ser lineal para los intervalos de concentraciones estudiados. Discusión El método se comporta de forma lineal, precisa y exacta. Además, es rápido, sensible y de bajo coste económico. Es un método útil para la determinación de concentraciones de LNZ en múltiples matrices biológicas. Es posible su utilización como base para posteriores estudios de farmacocinética clínica (AU)

Objective Evaluation of an analytic method for determining linezolid concentrations in biological fluids including plasma, vitreous humour and cerebrospinal fluid using high-efficiency liquid chromatography and subsequent ultraviolet detection. Method The method was validated by studying the following parameters: accuracy, precision, sensitivity, linearity and recovery. The drug was extracted from the biological matrix by means of a protein precipitation with perchloric acid. Chromatographic separation was performed by eluting linezolid with a mobile phase consisting of 80% K2HPO4 buffer solution (15mM; pH=5) and 20% acetonitrile, and a stationary phase, NOVAPAK C18 150×3.9mm with precolumn. The wavelength reading was 254nm and the working flow rate was 1ml/min. Results We obtained values with accuracies between 94.4 and 106.1%, and precisions between 0.88–6% and 3.7–5.6% for intra-and inter-day variability, respectively. Recovery obtained after analysing the plasma samples was at 93%. The method showed itself to be linear for the concentration levels under study (AU)

Linezolid cerebrospinal fluid concentration in central nervous system infection.

We report two cases of central nervous system infection due to methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus epidermidis treated with linezolid. The first case was a 72-year old woman with ventriculitis in the presence of intraventricular catheter: therapeutic effectiveness was documented clinically and microbiologically; serum and cerebrospinal fluid levels were measured after the first and fourth doses: trough linezolid concentrations in cerebrospinal fluid were 1.44 and 2.9 mg/L respectively, higher than the minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC). The second case was a 27-year old man with post-traumatic cerebral abscess; during 5 days linezolid was not found in his cerebrospinal fluid despite very high serum level peak, and the drug was not detectable in cerebral tissue surgically removed after 14 days of therapy. Linezolid may not reach therapeutic concentrations in cerebrospinal fluid, and, when possible, we suggest that drug levels be monitored.

Pharmacokinetics of intravenous linezolid in cerebrospinal fluid and plasma in neurointensive care patients with staphylococcal ventriculitis associated with external ventricular drains.

The pharmacokinetic profile of linezolid in cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) in five neurointensive care patients with staphylococcal ventriculitis was studied. The mean area under concentration-time curve (+/- standard deviation) was 63 +/- 18.9 mg x h/liter, with a CSF-to-plasma ratio of 0.8 +/- 0.3. Times above MIC in CSF were 99.8% and 57.2% for pathogens with MICs of 2 mg/liter and 4 mg/liter, respectively.

Serum and cerebrospinal fluid concentrations of linezolid in neurosurgical patients.

Linezolid is a new antimicrobial agent effective against drug-resistant gram-positive pathogens commonly responsible for central nervous system (CNS) infections in neurosurgical patients hospitalized in intensive care units. In order to study the penetration of this antimicrobial into the cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) of such patients, the disposition of linezolid in serum and CSF was studied in 14 neurosurgical patients given linezolid at 600 mg twice daily (1-h intravenous infusion) for the treatment of CNS infections caused by gram-positive pathogens or for prophylactic chemotherapy. Serum and CSF linezolid steady-state concentrations were analyzed by high-pressure liquid chromatography, and the concentration-time profiles obtained were analyzed to estimate pharmacokinetic parameters. The mean +/- standard deviation (SD) linezolid maximum and minimum measured concentrations were 18.6 +/- 9.6 microg/ml and 5.6 +/- 5.0 microg/ml, respectively, in serum and 10.8 +/- 5.7 microg/ml and 6.1 +/- 4.2 microg/ml, respectively, in CSF. The mean +/- SD areas under the concentration-time curves (AUCs) were 128.7 +/- 83.9 microg x h/ml for serum and 101.6 +/- 59.6 microg x h/ml for CSF, with a mean penetration ratio for the AUC for CSF to the AUC for serum of 0.66. The mean elimination half-life of linezolid in CSF was longer than that in serum (19.1 +/- 19.0 h and 6.5 +/- 3.6 h, respectively). The serum and CSF linezolid concentrations exceeded the pharmacodynamic breakpoint of 4 microg/ml for susceptible target pathogens for the entire dosing interval in the majority of patients. These findings suggest that linezolid may achieve adequate concentrations in the CSF of patients requiring antibiotics for the management or prophylaxis of CNS infections caused by gram-positive pathogens.

Successful treatment and cerebrospinal fluid penetration of oral linezolid in a patient with coagulase-negative Staphylococcus ventriculitis.

OBJECTIVE: To describe a case of coagulase-negative Staphylococcus ventriculitis successfully treated with oral linezolid, for which good cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) penetration was observed. CASE SUMMARY: A 69-year-old man had an extraventricular drain inserted following a right cerebellar infarct. On day 6, the CSF culture was positive for coagulase-negative staphylococci; intravenous vancomycin 1 g daily was initiated to treat ventriculitis. A ventriculoperitoneal shunt, inserted on day 35 to manage communicating hydrocephalus, was subsequently removed as symptoms suggesting infection presented. Coagulase-negative Staphylococcus was isolated from shunt reservoir aspirate, and intrathecal vancomycin 10 mg daily was added to the treatment regimen. On day 61, vancomycin was stopped and oral linezolid 600 mg twice daily was started. Linezolid was discontinued 22 days later, with no evidence of ongoing infection. Four blood samples were collected around the seventh dose of linezolid and 5 CSF samples were collected on separate days during treatment. Linezolid concentrations were measured in plasma and CSF by HPLC. Using an ADAPT II maximum a priori Bayesian estimator module, a 2 compartment pharmacokinetic model was fitted to the plasma linezolid concentration data and CSF:predicted plasma concentration ratios (ranging from 0.27 to 1.02) were derived. All CSF concentrations exceeded the reported 90% minimum inhibitory concentration of 2 mg/L for linezolid against coagulase-negative staphylococci. DISCUSSION: Evidence of the effectiveness of linezolid against central nervous system infections is growing; however, limited data exist describing its CSF penetration. Oral linezolid exhibited good CSF penetration in this patient, which corresponded to positive clinical response. CONCLUSIONS: Oral linezolid may play a valuable role in the treatment of multiresistant gram-positive central nervous system infections.